ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Aspire Z24-880

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire Z24-880 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire Z24-880
Memory	1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170418
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '21 at 11:11
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400T 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 157 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 263 38% 280 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 1189) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.88% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 6.6 4% 7.83 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 9.5 6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.88% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 487GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX1P5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 77 80 66 54 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 56.2 Write 81.8 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 70.9 42% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 62%
SABRENT 500GB 1,200 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 177GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 325 373 377 361 374 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6 2,874 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.7 9.9 9.8 9.8 9.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	9.28% Terrible	Read 20.6 Write 8.2 Mixed 7 SusWrite 9.7 13% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 83% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 9.28% Great: 7%
Kingston DataTrave 2.0 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 8 11 11 11 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	7.27% Terrible	Read 21 Write 10.2 Mixed 6 SusWrite 10.2 14% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.27% Great: 8%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSX 500GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 398GB free, PID 022b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 41 41 40 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 31.2 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 40.3 42% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 20%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB 2,703 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID 1643 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.5 2.5 3.4 3.7 3.3 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	5.3% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 0.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 3.3 5% 6.15 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.3% Great: 8%
UDISK PDU01_512 6BG2.0 1GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID 0163 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.3 2.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	2.72% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 3.2 6% 5.35 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.72% Great: 3%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 12.1 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Aspire Z24-880 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z24-880

CPU
Core i5-7400TIntelBench 65%, 4,070 samples	36x
Core i3-7100TIntelBench 61%, 2,911 samples	7x
Core i7-7700TIntelBench 72%, 7,380 samples	7x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	43x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	8x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8180S3128GI 128GBKingstonBench 61%, 1,733 samples	7x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x
CS1311 480GBPNY $31Bench 86%, 13,149 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 36%, 6,703 samples	9x
AO1P24HC4U1-BSHS AM1P24HC8T1-BURS 12GBAdataBench 55%, 4 samples	4x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback