Acer Aspire Z24-880

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire Z24-880  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z24-880
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 22:51
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 177
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 326
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1189) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 6.6
5% 8 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
487GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 76 78 81 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 97.2
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 78.1
55% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 62%
SABRENT 500GB
177GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 380 374 380 377 379 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6
4GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.9 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 8.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 9.7
13% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
94% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 7%
Kingston DataTrave 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 7.9 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
7.34% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 9.9
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 10.5
14% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.34%
Great: 8%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSX 500GB
398GB free, PID 022b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 41 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 34
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 41.2
43% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 20%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB
5GB free, PID 1643
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.1 4 4.9 4 3.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 1
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 4.2
7% 6.95 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 8%
UDISK PDU01_512 6BG2.0 1GB
0GB free, PID 0163
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.74% Terrible
Read 11.2
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3.5
7% 5.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.74%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.4
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Z24-880 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z24-880

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback