Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T3500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 09KPNV
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100916
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 13:51
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5570-$70
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 146
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 382
42% 329 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.56% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 10.6
7% 11.9 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.6
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$32
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 137 151 55 70 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 212
Write 110
Mixed 176
SusWrite 104
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 23.7
84% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 154
127% 181 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 91%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
262GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 91 92 90 88 90 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 92
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 89.4
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 51%
Hitachi HDT721064SLA360 640GB-$135
112GB free
Firmware: STDOA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 66.1
Mixed 40
SusWrite 69.2
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 59%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
197GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 100 100 101 99 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 89.6
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 95.6
56% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 57%
Specific USB DISK 32GB
19GB free, PID 0918
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 3.2 3 4.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Read 12
Write 4
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.5
6% 5.55 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
4% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 14.7
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T3500 Builds (Compare 3,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T3500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback