Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W280 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '21 at 07:43
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 76.2 2-Core 133 62% 99.8 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 398 44% 347 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Device(0000 0000) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 27 Parallax 31 18% 26.8 fps	MRender 33.3 Gravity 28.6 Splatting 24.8 23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 167 175 19 18 40 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.7% Poor	Read 245 Write 219 Mixed 224 SusWrite 85.5 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 0.5 29% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 147 169 173 174 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 172 Mixed 83 SusWrite 165 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$89 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 104 119 121 118 121 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 118 Write 102 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 116 73% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CH9 80CE M378B5773QB0-CK0 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 80CE M378B5773QB0-CK0 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	41.1% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	22x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	9x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	1x

GPU
FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics AdapterATIBench 4%, 464 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $77Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 202 samples	3x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x
CM3X2G1600C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 50%, 173 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16