Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 00:40
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 73.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 295
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,152
102% 866 Pts
64-Core 2,235
138% 2,235 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 142
Parallax 198
105% 156 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 138
Splatting 95.9
94% 117 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 995 417 892 805 814 582 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,030
Write 2,866
Mixed 1,605
SusWrite 751
356% 1,563 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 71.2
239% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 918
688% 913 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 202%
Great: 491%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
174GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 422 421 422 251 421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 418
Mixed 387
SusWrite 394
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 46.6
156% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 210
158% 212 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 101%
Great: 134%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
226GB free
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2394 2401 2406 2097 503 273 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,064
Write 2,026
Mixed 1,859
SusWrite 1,679
430% 1,907 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 79.3
278% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,638
DQ Write 1,313
DQ Mixed 1,525
1,128% 1,492 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 336%
Great: 390%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 76 80 83 84 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 91.5
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 82.5
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3600 C17 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 28
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 27.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback