Asus CM6850

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus CM6850  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6850
Memory14.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 22:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$200
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 163
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 414
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 6684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 197
Parallax 121
106% 149 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 131
Splatting 110
96% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 113 101 97 95 94 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.9% Average
Read 187
Write 172
Mixed 187
SusWrite 117
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 26.3
95% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 39.6
32% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
339GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 163 163 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 167
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 162
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GNT PSD38G16002 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.6
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6850 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6850

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback