Asus CM6850

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus CM6850  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6850
Memory14.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 19:06
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$200
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 165
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 438
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1614 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 45.2
38% 54.2 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 44.6
Splatting 39.6
34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 172
Write 198
Mixed 186
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 28.7
93% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 60.8
DQ Mixed 39.4
32% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
419GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 176 178 178 177 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 141
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 175
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GNT PSD38G16002 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6850 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6850

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback