Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '21 at 20:14
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 91 1-Core 123 2-Core 206 82% 140 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 430 60% 444 Pts	64-Core 461 28% 461 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.3% Average	Lighting 61.1 Reflection 62.4 Parallax 82 50% 68.5 fps	MRender 61.3 Gravity 63.4 Splatting 45.8 45% 56.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron M600 SATA M.2 256GB 2,750 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: MA01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 437 433 425 281 264 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 435 Write 410 Mixed 352 SusWrite 379 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 117 4K Mixed 48.4 174% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 252 216% 317 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA7S0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 184 177 186 181 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 183 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 182 107% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 5,939 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 24.8 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 22.4 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	211x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	186x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	167x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	176x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	167x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	108x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	88x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x

RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x16GBGEILBench 73%, 565 samples	56x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	33x
9905678-023.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 4,415 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16