Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 07:58
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 175
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 381
52% 385 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 76.1
Parallax 0.1
62% 50.9 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 72
Splatting 66.2
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 45 6.3 44 1.8 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 392
Write 330
Mixed 170
SusWrite 40
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 10.1
46% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 33.7
DQ Write 2.1
DQ Mixed 10.3
9% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 106%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
458GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 115 111 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 144
Write 128
Mixed 76.1
SusWrite 110
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 87%
WDC WD20 EARX-32PASB0 2TB
601GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 13 12 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.2% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 24.2
Mixed 19.6
SusWrite 22
32% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 18%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB
2TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.7 3.2 1.8 1.4 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 31.3
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 2.9
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 28.4
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 21.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $418
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback