Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6300 23 User benchmarks, average bench 35% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	34.8% Below average	Memory 63.6 1-Core 9.2 2-Core 37.2 28% 36.7 Pts	4-Core 38.8 8-Core 36.4 5% 37.6 Pts	64-Core 39 2% 39 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 115 107 50 41 38 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 238 Write 215 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 75.8 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 19.1 74% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 25.2 30% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 429GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 116 106 52 40 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 175 Write 141 Mixed 70.8 SusWrite 76.5 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16