TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201123
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '21 at 09:13
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 1,039
89% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,498
93% 1,498 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 87.2%
 Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 49
Parallax 41.5
26% 40.9 fps
MRender 44.2
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 34.5
32% 40 fps
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 28.3%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 386 331 259 363 397 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 450
Mixed 376
SusWrite 359
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 54.8
192% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 252
217% 321 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
263GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 94 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 86.8
Mixed 64
SusWrite 93.7
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 55.4%
 Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
23GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 10 9.7 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 17.8
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 10.7
24% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3
234% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 18%
 Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 40.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 39.1
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 101%
 Great: 120%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples486x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD  $190Bench 84%, 294,959 samples161x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples155x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples92x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples89x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples88x
SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples47x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples36x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples73x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples52x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback