Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2815 1,028 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 62.5 1-Core 12.1 2-Core 36 28% 36.9 Pts	4-Core 21 8-Core 26.7 3% 23.9 Pts	64-Core 28.5 2% 28.5 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1D05 1000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.51% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.51% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 410GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 32 42 45 27 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 11 Write 2.2 Mixed 2.3 SusWrite 35.4 9% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HB3SU002GGM6EML16 1x2GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.8 12% 4.2 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 0.7 5% 1.87 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 16%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	3x
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	4x

RAM
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 2,672 samples	3x
HB3SU002GGM6EML16 1x2GBUnknownBench 15%, 15 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16