Asrock 980DE3/U3S3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 980DE3/U3S3  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130409
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 31 '21 at 00:21
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 820
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 80.4
46% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 158
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 121E) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 18.9
15% 18.5 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 17.7
15% 17.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 182 24 52 26 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.8% Poor
Read 268
Write 216
Mixed 23
SusWrite 75.4
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.5
28% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
18GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 64 79 81 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 88.3
Write 90
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 75.6
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
52GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 93 95 100 102 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 95.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 95.7
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB
5GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 53 57 53 58 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 27
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 53.4
30% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 55%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
1GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.8
Write 65
Mixed 46.4
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
31GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 64 89 88 82 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 43.5
Write 79.3
Mixed 32
SusWrite 79.9
43% 58.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 114%
AMD 1X2 Mirror/RAID1 159GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 47.5
Write 30.5
Mixed 31.9
27% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
76GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 103 101 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 146
Write 123
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 102
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF SH564568FH8N0QHSCG Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
533, 533, 533 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.7% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 980DE3/U3S3 Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback