Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R3.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMar 30 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 155
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 317
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 63.2
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 60.7
52% 63.2 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 66
Splatting 60.8
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 141 65 24 50 66 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.4% Below average
Read 261
Write 234
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 87.1
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 0.8
52% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 7.8
DQ Mixed 26.8
34% 65 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
90GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 134 128 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 132
Write 131
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 129
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLGF65F-D8WMB Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R3.0 Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback