Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Red OpenStack Compute (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	34.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Core (Skylake) 34 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 0, 8 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 56.3 1-Core 79.2 2-Core 153 54% 96.2 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 393 45% 350 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 129GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 259 234 245 239 257 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 193 Write 287 Mixed 243 SusWrite 247 55% 243 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 7.6 31% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 62.7 DQ Write 60.7 DQ Mixed 39.9 36% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 83%
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 60GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 252 234 238 232 244 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Red Hat 4x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.1% Good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 32.1 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 5.2 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 158%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16