QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	18 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '17 at 15:13
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 184 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 574 58% 471 Pts	64-Core 656 41% 656 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.6% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 66.7 Parallax 57.3 47% 60.5 fps	MRender 73.3 Gravity 55.4 Splatting 53.2 49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 129GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 499 Write 484 Mixed 487 110% 490 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 19.8 96% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 30.5 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 18.6 44% 86 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 83%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 430GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.3% Very good	Read 146 Write 127 Mixed 128 101% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.21 71% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 1.5TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 421GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 111 Write 120 Mixed 119 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.25 88% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 20GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 4096 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 30.6 94% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16