HP 290 G3 Small Form Factor PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 290 G3 Small Form Factor PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8768
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 30 '21 at 15:36
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 236
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 680
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8768) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9127
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 7.8
6% 6.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 116 130 130 135 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 1017
Write 141
Mixed 206
SusWrite 129
80% 373 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 35.3
134% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 174
132% 182 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 98%
Great: 192%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
433GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 105 117 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 118
Write 120
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 117
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
899GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 95 111 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 125
Write 106
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 109
135% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.8
316% 3.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
348% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 66%
SAMSUNG HN-M500MBB 500GB
165GB free, PID 0237
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 53.2
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 77.4
84% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 41%
USB DISK 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.6 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 4.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5.1
8% 6.25 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4%
Great: 9%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
3GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.8 15 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 18.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 13.4
24% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8HJ-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 11.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 290 G3 Small Form Factor PC Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 290 G3 Small Form Factor PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $140
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback