Asrock H61M-VS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJun 30 '17 at 05:19
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 86
2-Core 169
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 321
43% 321 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8439) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 358.91
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
7.78% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 10
7% 9.16 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 11.7
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.78%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 31.7
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.32
83% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback