| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130225 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 29 '21 at 02:25 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | PER-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1610 @ 2.60GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
49.8%
Average
|
57% 93 Pts
|
17% 130 Pts
|
8% 128 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
1.36%
Terrible
|
1% 1.17 fps
|
2% 2.03 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 45 60 79 66 55 MB/s
|
28.6%
Poor
|
25% 114 MB/s
|
54% 17.4 MB/s
|
14% 18.1 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
382GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 111 110 111 MB/s
|
60.9%
Good
|
68% 92.8 MB/s
|
187% 1.23 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA MK6475GSX 640GB
2GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 29 28 27 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
34% 25.4 MB/s
|
76% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
34.5%
Below average
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
11% 3.87 GB/s
|
48% 84.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,447 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 251x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 225x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 213x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 454x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 219x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 146x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $287 |