Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 18:12
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 185
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 358
41% 321 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Sapphire(174B E289) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.1.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 73
Parallax 86.6
53% 75 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 61
Splatting 44.1
45% 56 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron 1100 SATA 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0DL020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 267 254 233 214 214 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 413
Write 414
Mixed 352
SusWrite 226
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 79.2
4K Mixed 35.7
124% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 246
180% 234 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79%
Great: 94%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
20GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 138 136 130 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 421
Write 182
Mixed 211
SusWrite 127
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 13.9
94% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 82.5
DQ Write 98.9
DQ Mixed 24.4
37% 68.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB
345GB free
Firmware: PC4ZC70F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 95 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 78.4
Mixed 52
SusWrite 93.8
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 58%
Samsung HN-M101M 1TB-$45
732GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 94 95 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 44.7
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 84.6
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 56%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
212GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 10 13 20 22 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 25
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback