Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime6 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 02:37
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 190
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 351
49% 360 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.87 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 82 88 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 96.9
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 90.5
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.4
230% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 69%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.1 5.1 5.7 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
6.97% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.1
11% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.97%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1810EC58E8F1333 RMR1810EC58E8F1333 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $83
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback