Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 19:31
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 902
83% 697 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
MSI(1462 3724) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 163
Parallax 166
137% 166 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 149
Splatting 125
120% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$55
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,458
Write 1,750
Mixed 1,415
414% 1,874 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 85.9
286% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 958
716% 952 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Amd-raid WDS100T1X0E-00AF 1TB
578GB free
Firmware: 6111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 932 799 608 608 615 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 667
Write 668
Mixed 731
SusWrite 690
156% 689 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 14.2
37% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 841
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 986
718% 928 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 120%
Great: 481%
Seagate ST6000VN0041-2EL11C 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 204 206 206 201 205 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 109%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
233GB free, PID null, SanDisk Ultra Flair 256 GB USB 3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 63 53 47 47 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 149
Write 62.2
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 50.8
88% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.5
137% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 38.4
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 34.3
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 112%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback