HP ZBook Studio G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200103
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 09:59
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 675
71% 571 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 844F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1518 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 22.4
20% 26 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 24.9
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 412 409 412 418 416 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1560
Write 527
Mixed 417
SusWrite 449
162% 738 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 43.2
153% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 311
298% 476 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 162%
Great: 216%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
242GB free
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 45 50 50 51 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
553% Outstanding
Read 5,962
Write 52.5
Mixed 103
SusWrite 47
320% 1,541 MB/s
4K Read 776
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3
1,180% 260 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 553%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 27.6
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G5 Builds (Compare 816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback