HP ProBook 470 G3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 470 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8102
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180123
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '21 at 10:44
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 143
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 208
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.37 fps
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 0.2
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 80 82 81 80 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 497
Write 475
Mixed 409
SusWrite 97.9
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 42
142% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 121%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
488GB free
Firmware: JA0OA7G0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 50 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 72.2
Write 68.3
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 49
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18.6
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 470 G3 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 470 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback