Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSupermicro X9DRL-3F/iF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRL-3F/iF
Memory120.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 14:47
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 161
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 620
58% 479 Pts
64-Core 1,620
100% 1,620 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD480HAGM-000DA 480GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM02W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 415 420 422 423 421 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 444
Write 388
Mixed 311
SusWrite 420
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 29.3
99% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 137
120% 179 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83%
Great: 109%
Toshiba THNSNJ1T02CSX 1TB
839GB free
Firmware: JXPS4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 205 205 205 205 205 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.1% Above average
Read 237
Write 205
Mixed 211
SusWrite 205
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 27
82% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 170
124% 162 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 106%
Hitachi H7220AS60SUN2.0T 2TB
16GB free
Firmware: A142
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 39 41 43 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.8% Above average
Read 146
Write 42.1
Mixed 52
SusWrite 41.4
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 54%
Hitachi H7220AS60SUN2.0T 2TB
630GB free
Firmware: A142
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
Read 103
Write 38.1
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 39.3
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 54%
Hitachi H7220AS60SUN2.0T 2TB
11GB free
Firmware: A142
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 35 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
Read 76.8
Write 82.4
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 34.3
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 54%
HP MB2000FCWDF 2TB
132GB free
Firmware: HPD9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 142
Write 41.6
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 36.8
51% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
181% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 77%
HP MB2000FCWDF 2TB
316GB free
Firmware: HPD5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 126
Write 39.4
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 40
47% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 77%
HP MB2000FCWDF 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPD5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 181
Write 44.8
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 44.9
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
185% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 77%
HP MB2000FBZPN 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPD1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 141
Write 41.2
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 41.5
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 76%
Hitachi H7220AS60SUN2.0T 2TB
792GB free
Firmware: A142
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 41 40 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.8% Average
Read 129
Write 39.5
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 40.4
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4A 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 32.2
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRL-3F/iF Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback