Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '21 at 11:18
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 218
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 818
75% 628 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
MSI(1462 2632) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.5 fps
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 2% Great: 2%
AMD HD 6850
XFX(1682 3114) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 14.9
10% 13.6 fps
Gravity 11.1
Splatting 9.8
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 11% Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid CT250MX50 250GB
185GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 38 101 107 68 54 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.64% Terrible
Read 59
Write 59.3
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 69.3
12% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 3.6
6% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 8.64%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
590GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 70 439 499 293 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 112
Write 536
Mixed 236
SusWrite 269
213% 288 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 3.8
551% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 110%
Great: 176%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EARS-22Y 1TB
830GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 4.5 20 27 19 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 25.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 15.5
12% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 29.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 24.7
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback