Mustek6376 Mecer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMustek6376 Mecer  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77MK
Memory25.2 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '21 at 06:29
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 177
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 350
47% 351 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 20.5
18% 22.6 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 16.5
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 194 89 73 87 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 419
Write 405
Mixed 315
SusWrite 140
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 23.6
90% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 161
157% 245 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 100%
Liteon LMH-256V2M-11 MSATA 256GB
129GB free
Firmware: FM8110C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 236 237 237 237 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61% Good
Read 251
Write 235
Mixed 217
SusWrite 229
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 27.8
92% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 152
125% 176 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61%
Great: 96%
HP v165w 2GB
1GB free, PID 5307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
5% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 5.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.7
10% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 859B CT102464BD160B.C16 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 28GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Mecer Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Mustek6376 Mecer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback