HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8509
Memory52.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateMar 23 '21 at 00:04
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 86.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,077
100% 834 Pts
64-Core 1,529
95% 1,529 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
HP(103C 8550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 200
Parallax 230
172% 214 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 214
Splatting 158
168% 213 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 157%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
800GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1501 1510 1524 1557 1569 1470 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 947
Write 1,909
Mixed 1,075
SusWrite 1,522
310% 1,363 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 50.1
151% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 840
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 234
236% 403 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 200%
Great: 295%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 227 227 232 235 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 200
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 228
129% 178 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 132%
Great: 130%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 217 222 223 225 214 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 146
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 219
111% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 117%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X KHX2666C16D4/16GX HP26D4U9D8ME-16X KHX2666C16D4/16GX 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.4% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 24.2
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 26.8
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $881
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback