Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 34.8 1-Core 25.6 2-Core 41.9 22% 34.1 Pts	4-Core 81.4 8-Core 84.8 11% 83.1 Pts	64-Core 85.2 5% 85.2 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.8 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.9 1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
N20D 128GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0722A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 314 276 294 286 274 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 316 Write 288 Mixed 250 SusWrite 276 64% 282 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 18.7 4K Mixed 11.7 44% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 38.1 56% 105 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 74%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 128GB-$80 665 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 76GB free, PID 16b3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 91.2 Write 97.2 Mixed 83.7 117% 90.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 52% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	20% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 228 18% 228 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	10x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	10x

SSD
N20D 128GBBench 56%, 34 samples	10x

RAM
123456789012345678 2x4GBABCDBench 24%, 783 samples	6x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	4x