Ditecma MLP2092R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDitecma MLP2092R  (all builds)
MotherboardDITECMA MLP2092R
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 04:50
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 39.7
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 67.4
29% 47.4 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 115
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.23 fps
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
N20D 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 90 116 92 133 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 365
Write 316
Mixed 326
SusWrite 117
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 13.3
65% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 39.1
74% 147 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 74%
ADATA HD650 1TB
914GB free, PID a35a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 38 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 38.9
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 38.8
46% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MLP2092R Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Ditecma MLP2092R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback