ADD TO PC
BUILD

Semp K201

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Semp K201 (all builds)
Motherboard	Semp K201
Memory	1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090629
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '21 at 21:27
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1,736 User benchmarks, average bench 34% mPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Memory 45.9 1-Core 30.1 2-Core 59.8 29% 45.3 Pts	4-Core 58.3 8-Core 60.1 8% 59.2 Pts	64-Core 60.2 4% 60.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50 4,054 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: HH100-08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 58 56 56 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 61.6 Write 64.9 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 57.2 41% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 36%
USB Flash Disk 64GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 41GB free, PID 2000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6 10 10 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.91% Terrible	Read 1.2 Write 0.8 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 9 6% 3.62 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.91% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.53% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.33 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.53% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback