Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardQIYIDA X99-H9
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '21 at 11:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 169
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 509
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 199
Parallax 191
181% 204 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 151
Splatting 134
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 515 512 371 88 81 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 544
Mixed 605
SusWrite 272
154% 700 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 21.7
185% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 322
283% 416 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 145%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.8% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback