HP p7-1414

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP p7-1414  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '21 at 20:49
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 53
2-Core 87.1
40% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 138
17% 132 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
HP(103C 2AE0) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 4.4
3% 5.13 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 4
Splatting 6.4
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
705GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 158 187 189 71 192 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
SONY WALKMAN 13GB
10GB free, PID 0ca0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 6.6 7.7 8.1 8.3 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 24.7
Write 27.2
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 7.8
29% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 4.4
327% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 56%
SONY WALKMAN 128GB
119GB free, PID 0ca0
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 14 13 16 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 29.1
Write 26.3
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 13
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 3
278% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 CT102464BA160B.C16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 13
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1414 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1414

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback