Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3520M 19,660 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 160 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 234 32% 237 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 5200M 1,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 1534) 1GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9263 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	2.86% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 0.7 3% 3.6 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.86% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF870400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 112 115 123 131 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Read 311 Write 309 Mixed 170 SusWrite 135 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 5.5 44% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 68.6 DQ Mixed 33.6 41% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5273EB0-CK0 6GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	43.9% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	981x
NVS 5200MNvidiaBench 3%, 1,721 samples	160x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	9x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	31x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	26x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	25x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28