Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory36.5 GB free of 40 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 17:41
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 86
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 876
92% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1647 MHz, MLim: 993 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.7% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 106
Parallax 183
86% 132 fps
MRender 93.1
Gravity 123
Splatting 78.4
78% 98 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 798
Write 538
Mixed 226
114% 521 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 35.9
182% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 401
338% 482 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 214%
Kingdian S280 120GB
42GB free
Firmware: R1008A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 144 144 145 144 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 383
Mixed 402
SusWrite 174
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 54.9
184% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 120
112% 175 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 109%
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
175GB free
Firmware: SBFZ10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 479
Write 373
Mixed 339
SusWrite 132
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 36.8
144% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 158
122% 167 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 89%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
131GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 453 199 155 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 465
Write 450
Mixed 392
SusWrite 262
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 38.5
138% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 95%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
234GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1992 1511 1504 1509 1509 1514 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2034
Write 2,163
Mixed 1,840
SusWrite 1,590
430% 1,907 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 80.2
286% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,457
DQ Write 751
DQ Mixed 1,246
888% 1,151 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 316%
Great: 347%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
34GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 158 175 168 147 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 152
Write 122
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 159
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GIS Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GIS 40GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 4096, 16384, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 32.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 34.1
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback