Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory36.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 03:40
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 321
103% 190 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 973
98% 793 Pts
64-Core 1,194
74% 1,194 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1647 MHz, MLim: 993 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 107
Parallax 170
88% 128 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 123
Splatting 77.4
78% 97.9 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 768
Write 487
Mixed 346
117% 534 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 61.3
210% 82.3 MB/s
DQ Read 621
DQ Write 606
DQ Mixed 245
285% 491 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 214%
Kingdian S280 120GB
42GB free
Firmware: R1008A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 145 145 145 144 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 319
Mixed 401
SusWrite 174
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 54.7
182% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 120
112% 174 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
141GB free
Firmware: SBFZ10.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 96 95 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 474
Write 378
Mixed 337
SusWrite 131
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 36.1
142% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 157
122% 166 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 89%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
131GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 426 215 152 154 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 467
Write 384
Mixed 392
SusWrite 259
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 38.2
136% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 95%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
234GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1987 1513 1510 1514 1509 1514 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,017
Write 2,181
Mixed 1,803
SusWrite 1,591
428% 1,898 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 79.2
279% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,532
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 1,309
936% 1,216 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 316%
Great: 347%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
34GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 160 171 168 152 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 106
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 160
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GIS Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 G.SKILL F4-2133C15-4GIS 40GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 4096, 16384, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 33.3
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 34
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback