Asus GL702VSK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL702VSK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VSK
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '21 at 01:52
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 197
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 569
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1660) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.9% Very good
Lighting 84.5
Reflection 112
Parallax 88.3
69% 95.1 fps
MRender 89.1
Gravity 88
Splatting 95.5
75% 90.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 918 834 604 845 781 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,256
Write 916
Mixed 615
SusWrite 775
199% 890 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 44.5
139% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 800
DQ Write 739
DQ Mixed 634
513% 724 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 175%
Great: 355%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
403GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 104 101 101 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 132
Write 117
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 103
69% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC M471A2K43CB1-CTD 32GB
2400, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 25.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VSK Builds (Compare 589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL702VSK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback