TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI 760GM-P21(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GM-P21(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120217
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 14:58
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 270-$20
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 30.4
35% 46.8 Pts
4-Core 67.9
8-Core 73.3
9% 70.6 Pts
64-Core 97.7
6% 97.7 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 37.4%
 Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
PwrHis(1787 200B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
8.32% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 9.9
9% 10.6 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 7.8
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 8.32%
 Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 72 81 103 119 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 81
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 91.9
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 57.2%
 Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5584-003.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 28.4%
 Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 760GM-P21(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P21(FX) (MS-7641)

CPU
FX-6300AMD  $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples27x
FX-4100AMD  $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples19x
FX-6100AMD  $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples17x
GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples5x
SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial  $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples3x
SSD 128GBBiwinBench 57%, 1,868 samples3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston  $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples3x
RAM
GR1600D364L11/4G00 GR1600D364L11/4G00 8GBUnknownBench 36%, 13 samples3x
9905403-439.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 2,460 samples2x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback