HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 Plus

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 Plus  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 Plus
Memory740.1 GB free of 768 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200718
Uptime26.7 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 08:53
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7452 32-Core
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 922
81% 691 Pts
64-Core 4,237
262% 4,237 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPE LOGICAL VOLUME 240GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 326
Write 193
Mixed 263
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 33.1
126% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 485
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 289
228% 324 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA4GR7AJR8N-XN 24x32GB
24 of 32 slots used
767GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
159% Outstanding
MC Read 66.3
MC Write 62.6
MC Mixed 65.1
185% 64.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 28.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback