Lenovo QAWGE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo QAWGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo IdeaPad G485
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130116
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 17 '21 at 02:06
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Memory 24.4
1-Core 7.4
2-Core 18.3
12% 16.7 Pts
4-Core 19.3
8-Core 17.8
2% 18.5 Pts
64-Core 18.2
1% 18.2 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290
Legend(17AA 397F) 384MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.87 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9120822AS 120GB-$35
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.BHE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 35 38 35 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 36.7
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 36.5
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LN-SD302160011MA8R 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.19% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.8
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 290
14% 290 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.19%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QAWGE Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo QAWGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback