NCR 7606-1007-8801

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNCR 7606-1007-8801  (all builds)
MotherboardNCR Pocono
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 20:51
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$134
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 156
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 387
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SX950U 480GB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 280 264 253 280 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 303
Write 292
Mixed 280
SusWrite 273
65% 287 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 23.4
82% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 62.6
DQ Mixed 25.8
24% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 123%
Transcend TS480GSSD220S 480GB
205GB free
Firmware: P0624AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 189 103 66 66 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 350
Write 320
Mixed 292
SusWrite 137
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 32.9
100% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 44.9
38% 53 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team--Elite-1333 0198061012A935BC 9905458-009.A00LF 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7606-1007-8801 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: NCR 7606-1007-8801

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $134
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback