Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55D-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100722
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '21 at 16:23
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 64.8 2-Core 132 60% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 368 38% 304 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5750 12,403 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Sapphire(174B E138) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	8.45% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 10.1 9% 11 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 7.9 7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.45% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 715GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 81 92 92 93 92 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.3% Good	Read 241 Write 241 Mixed 241 SusWrite 87.1 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 62 4K Mixed 35.6 121% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 133%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$41 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 38GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 66 64 63 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 63.1 Write 63.5 Mixed 46.1 SusWrite 62.8 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 156GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 78 77 75 73 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 69.6 Write 68.8 Mixed 56.6 SusWrite 73.6 50% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 192GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 81 92 91 93 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 207 Write 166 Mixed 83 SusWrite 87.6 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$33 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 81GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 54 58 55 48 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 113 Write 114 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 52.4 65% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$98 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: MX6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 92 91 93 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 182 Write 182 Mixed 59 SusWrite 88.5 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 108%
WD Elements 2621 2TB 11,378 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 830GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 25.8 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 13.7 31% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 64%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 808GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.51% Terrible	Read 31 Write 27.2 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 13.8 31% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 9.51% Great: 63%
Disk drive 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 93GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.4% Very poor	Read 29 Write 15.8 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 18 28% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 12%
Disk drive 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 502GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	9.16% Terrible	Read 26.8 Write 24.3 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 18 28% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.16% Great: 17%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 206GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 28.3 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 13.5 32% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	40% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	21x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	14x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	7x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $80Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	28x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	19x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $518

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16