PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus A88XM-A (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140401 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 16 '21 at 15:50 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 53% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
679GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 327 332 328 339 324 MB/s
|
82%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
512GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 113 113 113 MB/s
|
78.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 53x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 39x |
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 31x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 31x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $178 |