Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '21 at 12:08
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 214
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 556
62% 489 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3262
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Inte SSDSC2BF180A4H 180GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 127 132 136 157 169 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.4% Good
Read 253
Write 74.8
Mixed 160
SusWrite 142
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 29.3
114% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 23.1
58% 124 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
275GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 105 106 105 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 171
Write 133
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 109
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
374GB free
Firmware: ES22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 120 120 120 126 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 77.8
Write 77
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 122
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 100%
WD WD3000FYYZ-01UL1 3TB
248GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 101 110 105 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 91.8
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 105
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 98%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3.5
Mixed 3.3
4% 3.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB HP698650-154-MCN 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback