Lenovo 20S5S15705

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 34% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20S5S15705  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20S5S15705
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201210
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 17:00
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 22%
CPU Throttled 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10610U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 46.1
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 156
49% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 331
32% 265 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 22B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 5.2
4% 8.87 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 4
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.39%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB
808GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 600 466 658 1038 1098 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 958
Write 689
Mixed 732
SusWrite 740
175% 780 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 48.5
154% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 327
208% 238 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 141%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE Micron 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2E1 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback