Ctl___ computertechnologylinkxppro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCtl___ computertechnologylinkxppro  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ35JO
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '21 at 03:45
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 42
2-Core 83.3
42% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 80
8-Core 81.1
11% 80.6 Pts
64-Core 77.1
5% 77.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A 250GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 213 207 212 213 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.2% Above average
Read 214
Write 202
Mixed 144
SusWrite 211
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 29.6
92% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 39.3
36% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 105%
Samsung SV0432A 4GB
4GB free
Firmware: KH101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.34% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 14
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 14.6
10% 13.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.34%
Great: 8%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
780GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 163 164 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 164
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 163
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback