MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 282
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 76.8
55% 72.4 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 59
Splatting 43
44% 55.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKJW120H6 120GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RG11
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 231
Write 145
Mixed 231
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 38.7
126% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 112
102% 156 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 85%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
141GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 392 417 402 404 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 235
Write 119
Mixed 263
SusWrite 376
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 35.2
130% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 168
155% 234 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1866C10D3/8G 0420 F3-2400C11-4GXM 20GB
1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback