Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '17 at 17:06
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 90%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 235
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 716
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 144
Parallax 126
110% 135 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 133
Splatting 109
96% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST31000333AS 2TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: CC13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 212
Mixed 164
143% 191 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.24
52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 117%
Great: 117%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
3.5TB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 193
Mixed 171
149% 199 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.35
75% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 122%
Great: 66%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
3.5TB free
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 168
Mixed 99
104% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.22
64% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 66%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 203
Mixed 162
146% 196 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.79
4K Mixed 0.23
46% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 121%
Great: 75%
Samsung HD103SJ 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 171
Mixed 183
134% 177 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.41
4K Mixed 0.47
175% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 38
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 21.6
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 60.1
66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback