Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 75.6 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 139 59% 98.6 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 194 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 212E) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 5.8 Parallax 1.6 2% 3.2 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150 16,934 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 451GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 441 458 463 413 415 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	Read 432 Write 422 Mixed 391 SusWrite 437 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 32.3 103% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 363 273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 6GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	35x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	23x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	21x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	2x
SSDPR-CX300-120 120GBBench 68%, 1,185 samples	2x
BX200 480GBCrucial $160Bench 78%, 11,290 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 45%, 3,512 samples	9x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	5x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	4x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $200