Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds)
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140725
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '17 at 12:45
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 95.7 1-Core 112 2-Core 224 83% 144 Pts	4-Core 409 8-Core 718 68% 564 Pts	64-Core 916 57% 916 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85A4) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Lighting 77.7 Reflection 76.6 Parallax 66.1 63% 73.5 fps	MRender 71.4 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 72.3 59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 1,751 Write 1,798 Mixed 1,527 378% 1,692 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 24.7 172% 66.7 MB/s	DQ Read 41.3 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 119 82% 98.6 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 353%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 118GB free Firmware: DXM04B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11500 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4203 (B1) Unknown 90 90 347 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 60 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 583 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21640237731	79.2% Very good	Read 511 Write 373 Mixed 415 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 19 115% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 76 DQ Mixed 16.2 23% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4TB free Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 10437 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 429 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 778 (0A) Spinup retry count 108 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 201 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 523 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197569282074 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 630 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 203 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	96.5% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 170 Mixed 158 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 4.21 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.26 244% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 109%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 570 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 971GB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 158 Mixed 120 112% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.07 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.2 92% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 128%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 933GB free, PID 3320 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 92.4 Write 99.6 Mixed 9.01 78% 67 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 7.02 4K Mixed 0.37 254% 2.68 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608ET3LX0 4x8GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	90% Outstanding	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 32.6 98% 34.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 13.7 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 54.9 73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	434x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	383x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	296x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	104x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	100x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	77x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	61x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	29x
Dominator DHX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 73%, 416 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1866 4x8GBCorsairBench 88%, 441 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $812

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16